  
|
Calvin Klein has once again been banned from networks for his provocative commercial, last year it was the Obsession fragrance commercial with Eva Mendes censored for its nudity. Now the commercial for the Jeans campaign has gotten even racier, “which has a grainy quality and looks like it was produced in an old basement, with models Anna Selezneva, Anna Jagodzinska and Natasha Poly” who are practically naked except for their Calvin Klein Jeans rubbing up on each other. The commercial was shot by Steven Meisel and the “15- and 30-second spots will initially be exclusive online at calvinkleinjeans.com beginning Friday”. Calvin Klein is working on an edited version of the commercial to be aired on cable for the US, let’s see how that turns out. We all know sex sells, so enjoy! via WWD Watch the banned Calvin Klein commercial after the jump…
7 Responses to “Calvin Klein Jeans Racy Commercial”COMMENTS PAGE: |
 |
For all their advertising, I’ve never worn a pair of CK in my life, and I’ve never known anyone else to have worn them. The only CK thing that I know ppl wear are underwears.
CK look for any desperate attempt to revive the days of old…too bad. they just keep getting sleezier and sleezier I am not impressed. Is objectifying women this blantantly good for business? I won’t support this tired brand, that is for sure… womp womp at this marketing ploy to get people talking about them again…
i think its hot…
I think it is disgraceful and if i let my daughter buy the jeans before I would not let her buy them now!!!! Our teens have enough PPOBLEMS WITH EARLY SEX and you are not helping them!!!
But truthfully all pricey brand names do this…hollister and abercrombie are a couple…
this is actually beautiful, artistically perfect, ppl need to stop thinking about the arousal sense of the photo and think of it as a whole. I have abosultely no turn on from this and its kinda wierd if u do. the way the models perfectly proportioned and chiseled bodies mold to together is fascinating. I don't see how you can trash aphoto like this but call a nude painting art.
Advertising is NOT art, you idiot – it's designed to sell you something. In this case, a feeling of sexual excitement when you purchase the jeans. It's extremely damaging to the psyche of men to see erotic imagery of women, which research has shown over an over again. A well-know study had a group of men subjected to porno/erotic images of under-dressed women and a control group not shown any images. Several hours later, both groups were asked to interview an attractive woman for a job. Without exception, the group subjected to pronography asked the woman pointed sexual questions and made comments to this effect, and commented on her appearance when asked about her qualifications for the role. The group of men who didn't look at the images were respectful and professional, which demonstrates that porn and erotica doesn't just affect the viewer, it affects society. Girls as young as 10 years of age post erotic images of themselves electronically – how can this be healthy? How can this possibly advance humanity? These girls are being bred to consume and be consumed, rather than contribute to justice, health, education, and the general well-being of mankind. And so are our boys, by the way.